So long, Scriptura
And the
child Samuel ministered unto the LORD before Eli. And the word of the LORD was
precious in those days; there was no open vision (1stSamuel3:1)
Just
grab your Bible for a moment & hold it in your hand. I don’t know how many
copies you may own, but apparently [at
the time of this writing] there have been approximately some 4 billion Bibles sold to date. The copy
that you hold in your hand right now is most likely one of them.
We
owe a great debt of gratitude to a great many individuals for the privilege of being
free to hold, read & believe the
copy of the Bible that usually sits unread for most [if not all] of the week in its convenient place, so that we don’t
forget to pick it up on our way out to church on Sunday. Don’t forget to clean
away the dust that gathers around it eh.
All
of us are at liberty to find & choose a particular Bible version that suits
us, after all, no translation into any
human language will accurately convey the mind of Almighty God, however,
through the ministry of The Holy Spirit, Who is the author of the book that we
hold to so dearly, we can begin to understand God’s Word (2ndTimothy3:14-17)
& although we may sometimes disagree about the validity of some versions
& the superiority of others, our passion has to be more than something egotistical or intellectual. As my
first Pastor often said to me about my Bible, ‘..don’t have it & not read it; don’t read it & not believe it;
don’t believe it & not obey it..’. How often I have failed to take his
sterling advice.
He
would sometimes take my Bible from me & look through the pages to see where
they were worn. He would read through the scribblings that I made in the
margins or on the multi-coloured post it notes that I had stuck to the pages
& he would giggle before handing it back to me. I never discovered what had
made him laugh.
Let us labor therefore to enter into
that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief. For the word
of God is quick, and powerful,
and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of
soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart. Neither
is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of
him with whom we have to do (Hebrews4:11-13).
My
Pastor always placed a strong emphasis the fact that our faith in God must come out of our relationship with a
living Saviour, the Son of the living God (Matthew16:16, Revelation1:18). As well as this, he
taught us that our faith must be rooted & grounded in the fact that our Lord Jesus Christ is God’s Word & as such The Word
lives & breathes. This understanding of faith was far removed from the classic, more forensic word-of-faith-mythology
that I eventually [& unfortunately]
embraced later on in my believer’s walk.
In the beginning was the Word, and the
Word was with God, and
the Word was God. The same was in the
beginning with God. All things were made by him; and without him was not any
thing made that was made. In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not…He was
in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not…And the
Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as
of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. (John1:1-5,10&14).
Through faith we understand that the
worlds were framed by the
word of God, so that things which are
seen were not made of things which do appear (Hebrews11:3).
Are
you still holding your Bible in your hand? You & I possess a volume of
writings unlike any other body of
work ever written down. What these
sacred books of the canon of Scripture say to us & who they reveal to us
are of a paramount importance if our
faith in God & His Word are to be genuine. A contrived belief that springs
out of simply learning Scripture by rote is quite honestly the stuff of cults.
The Word of The Lord must once again be precious, especially in these last days.
Each
faction, denomination, movement or ism within The Church, has a different view
of The Word of God & consequently of Christ. On a sliding scale there are
those who believe in the complete verbal inspiration of Scripture, right
through to those who believe it to be nothing more or less than a collection of
writings, only sacred in their ideal, but not in their essence & certainly
no more or less inspired than the other texts of other religions.
Well,
just as the very best tool for interpreting Scripture is Scripture itself, I
think it wise to see what Scripture says about itself in order to determine
whether it’s God’s Word or not. This determination is vital because God’s Word
is consistently being held in decreasing esteem. What happens when The Word of
God [& its place among us] is
diminished & what replaces that which ought to be irreplaceable?
On
a small scale & in limited measure I have seen this happen; even in my own
life. The subtle groundwork for such a travesty is laid in advance of any
onslaught on God’s Word & seldom do we see its approach, sense its danger
or discern its deadly ruination. Nevertheless it comes. In this regard, before any of us take to the Scriptures with a
view to reading them, we have to first establish why it is that we would even
do such a thing. In other words, is The Bible required reading for us who believe? Are you still holding your
Bible in your hand my friend? Please ask yourself why it is that you have it, why
it is that you read it, why it is
that you believe it & ultimately why
it is that it possesses the authority to command & demand your obedience
& mine. I can only answer this question for myself, but there’s a good
chance that the reasons I cite may be similar to yours.
I
was raised as an Anglican, joining the church choir when I was 7 years old
& [under duress] accepting
confirmation when I was 16. However, I’d been born again at the age of 13 &
on the night that I had received Christ as my Saviour I went home, got my
mother’s Bible & read all four Gospels, the book of Romans & the entire
book of revelation in one sitting. Although I didn’t understand most of what
I’d read, I had an almost insatiable appetite for it, but why? It’s very
simple.
The
brother who had led me to Christ told me that I should read The Bible. He told
me that it was God’s Word & that as I read it, The Holy Spirit would open
my understanding of it. He told me that I should pray & read Scripture
daily. This I did. However, when I spoke to my parish Priest, he had something
altogether different to say about The Bible & my study of it. This is the
juncture at which Scripture’s declarations concerning itself become the proof
of the pudding.
God, who at sundry times and in divers
manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last
days spoken unto us by his Son,
whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds; who
being the brightness of his glory,
and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of
his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand
of the Majesty on high; being made so much better than the angels, as he hath
by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they (Hebrews1:1-4).
I
had learned very early on in my believer’s walk that The Bible is essential for
growth (1stPeter2:2). Yet there were those [like my parish priest] who preferred a
more liberal view of The Bible’s role in Christian life & church doctrine.
Because St. Peter’s was very ‘High Church’
there were elements of the liturgy that resembled Roman Catholicism. It was
here that I used that age old, classic Pentecostal phrase ‘where’s that in The Bible?’, much to the annoyance of the vicar. I
questioned the necessity & role of a priesthood, the biblical basis for
their particular administration of the sacraments & the nature of their
ecclesiastical garb. All of these questions & more had arisen within me
simply because I had been reading my Bible.
For
those attendees who didn’t read
Scripture, although there were several saints who did, these questions were absolutely irrelevant. They saw no need
whatsoever for a literal belief in The Bible, but rather for an ‘in-principle’ acceptance
of it; Scripture contained God’s Word
but was not His Word in its totality.
I pondered this point of view, which made logical sense to me. However, those
with whom I fellowshipped in Pentecostal circles took the view that it wasn’t
enough for the issue to make logical
sense; it had to make theological
sense.
Despite
my objections to certain [but not all]
elements of Anglican theology & ecclesiology, my name was sneaked across
the desk of the Bishop of Leicester as a likely candidate for a ceremony known
as The Boy Bishop. Beyond this of course, was a plan to encourage my entrance
into the ministry of The Anglican Church. This was never to happen. However,
the ceremony went ahead & enrobed in Bishop’s paraphernalia, with Mitre
& Crosier to boot, I delivered a wee homily & had my picture taken by
the local newspaper. My message was a simple one; So Long, Scriptura. Of
course, this was my attempt at a play on the words Sola Scriptura; Scripture alone.
The
basic thrust of my [less than ten minute]
sermon was this: the church we have now, is a direct result of our building
upon whatever foundation we as followers of Christ have believed to be sound.
In support of this I cited the words of Christ Himself in Matthew16:15-18 ‘And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the
Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him,
Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father
which is in heaven. And I say also
unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and
the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.’ Given the choice, I would
take the words of The Lord Jesus Christ over the words of anyone else, on any day of the week.
*I cannot
stress how important I believe it is that we as believers in Christ receive a
revelation of exactly who Jesus is. However, I’m not promoting an experience as any kind of subjective proof. I’m
seeking to provoke believers to delve further into their Bibles because it is
right there that the written Word
reveals the Living Word.
Here,
Peter declares a truth revealed to him by The Father concerning Christ & it
is upon this rock that Jesus is
building His Church. However, Peter was not the only disciple of The Lord who knew this. In chapter one of the
Gospel that bears his name, we see that John has a revelation of Christ as The
Word (John1:1-5,10&14). We also see John’s revelation of Christ’s
deity quite clearly throughout his account of The Lord’s ministry. John, the
disciple whom Jesus loved, knew Who Jesus was.
The next day John seeth Jesus coming
unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the
world! This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred
before me; for he was before me. And I knew him not: but that he should be made
manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. And John bare
record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it
abode upon him. And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water,
the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and
remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I
saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God (John1:29-34).
Here
we see John the Baptist, a cousin of Christ, testifying that he didn’t know who
Jesus was until God revealed it to him. In verse 6 of this first chapter of
John’s Gospel, John the Baptist is described as ‘a man sent from God’ & here in verse 33 John tells us that he that sent [him] to baptize with water told
him how to recognise The Messiah. John saw & bore record that Jesus was the
Son of God. John the Baptist knew who Jesus was.
As
we go further, we see Jesus beginning to call His disciples & the narrative
here is amazing. It is to me anyway.
Again the next day after, John stood,
and two of his disciples; and looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold
the Lamb of God! And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed
Jesus. Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What
seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted,
Master,) where dwellest thou? He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and
saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth
hour. One of the two which heard John speak,
and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He first findeth
his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messiah, which is,
being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus
beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called
Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone. The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth
Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me. Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of
Andrew and Peter. Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found
him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth,
the son of Joseph. And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come
out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Jesus saw Nathanael
coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!
Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto
him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee. Nathanael answered and saith
unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel. Jesus
answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig
tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these. And he saith
unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open,
and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man. (John1:35-51).
This
narrative, although different to the accounts given by the other Gospel writers,
nevertheless reveals something quite remarkable & notable. John’s Gospel is
not synoptic. From the very beginning of His life & ministry, Jesus’
identity was revealed by God to certain individuals. Mary & Joseph knew.
The Shepherds & Wise Men knew. Anna & Simeon knew. Satan & demonic
spirits knew. The Bible that you’re holding in your hand is a veritable
treasure trove of truth concerning Christ & who He is. The knowledge of who
He is, is the rock upon which Christ
builds His Church & the transformative power of that truth, with He Himself
being the cornerstone, gives us an assurance of trust because He is The Word of God.
John,
Andrew & the unnamed disciple, Peter, Philip & Nathanael all had this
knowledge of Christ. They were among the first, but were certainly not the
last. Faith in the Living Word must be reflected in our faith in the written
Word.
For through him we both have access by
one Spirit unto the Father. Now therefore ye are no more strangers and
foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints, and of the household of God;
and are built upon the foundation of the
apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone; in whom all the building fitly
framed together groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord: in whom ye also are
builded together for a habitation of God through the Spirit (Ephesians2:18-22).
To whom coming, as unto a living stone, disallowed indeed of men, but chosen of
God, and precious, ye also, as
lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, a holy priesthood, to offer up
spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ. Wherefore also it is
contained in the Scripture, Behold, I lay in Zion a chief corner stone, elect,
precious: and he that believeth on him shall not be confounded. Unto you
therefore which believe he is precious:
but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed,
the same is made the head of the corner, and a stone of stumbling, and a rock
of offense, even to them which
stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed (1Peter2:4-8).
If
we consider Matthew’s account of the revelation of Christ once again, we will
see that Peter re-affirms what he & certain of the other the disciples certainly
believed. We also see that Jesus re-affirms what He had said to Peter when his
brother Andrew had taken him to meet The Lord. The Church that Jesus Christ is
building must have the Living Word as
it’s foundation & it must have what
Paul describes as ‘..the word of his
grace, which is able to build [us] up..’ (Acts20:32).
The
Church is built on The Word as well
as by The Word. Those twelve men [eleven of whom finished their course]
were students of the greatest Rabbi who ever lived; Rabbi Yeshua ben Yosef.
After His death, burial & resurrection, they taught believers what He had
taught them. This was the Apostles’
Doctrine & the basis of our New Testament in His blood (Matthew26:28).
However, none of the teachings of
Christ were manifest out of thin air. They had their basis in Scripture.
*Sadly there are those who never delve
into the Old Testament because they haven’t realised that both covenants are
inextricably linked by a glorious unfolding of fulfilment. The Old Covenant
makes up two-thirds of The Bible that you’re holding in your hand my friend
& before you discard it as irrelevant to you, I would encourage you to
study it. It’s the meat. Many of the New Testament truths that we
hold dear as fundamental doctrine, have their root in the Old Testament &
we would do well to heed it.
The
validity & relevance of the New Testament is clearly taken for granted by The Church. Yet, Jesus Himself &
the New Testament writers continually
reference the Old. We have been told that the New Testament writings,
especially those of Paul, are for The Church & that we should concentrate
our efforts in studying it, but this approach partially robs us theologically.
However, if you don’t believe me
that’s fine. Believe Jesus. Do you still have your Bible in your hand?
As
you thumb through the Gospels, you’ll see that Jesus references the books of
Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers & Dueteronomy. What decent Rabbi worth
his salt wouldn’t? He also quotes
from the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah, Zachariah, Daniel, Micah, Hosea, Malachi &
The Psalms. His validation of the Old Testament spanned its entirety.
*The Law (Torah) - Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, & Deuteronomy. The
Prophets (Neviim) - Joshua, Judges, 1
& 2 Samuel (one volume), 1 & 2 Kings (one volume), Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, the 12 Minor Prophets (one volume). The Writings (Kethubim) - Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Ruth,
Song of Solomon, Ecclesiastes, Lamentations, Esther, Daniel, Ezra and Nehemiah
(one volume), 1 & 2 Chronicles (one volume). In Rabbinic tradition,
quoting one book from any of these biblical collections
validated the entire collection. Christ’s
handling of the TaNaKh is a masterclass.
And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you,
while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written
in the law of Moses, and in the
prophets, and in the psalms,
concerning me. Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand
the Scriptures, and said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behooved
Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: and that repentance
and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations,
beginning at Jerusalem. And ye are witnesses of these things (Luke24:44-48).
If
Jesus opened their understanding in
order that they might understand the
Scriptures, will He not do the same
thing for us, who also believe? Both
the Old & New Testaments that you hold in your hand right now contain the revelation of Jesus Christ,
including the very last book of The Bible that bears that very name. Sadly,
however, there are those within The Church who are ‘foolish & slow of heart to believe’ (Luke24:25-27). I must
admit to being one of the above, but thankfully The Lord hasn’t finished with
me.
Search the Scriptures; for in them ye
think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. And ye will
not come to me, that ye might have life. I receive not honour from men. But I
know you, that ye have not the love of God in you. I am come in my Father’s
name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will
receive. How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not
the honour that cometh from God
only? Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had
ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye
believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? (John5:39-47).
It
is here, at this point that The Church has seen an increasing number of its
leadership & membership rapidly leave the rails of orthodoxy. The relevance
of Scripture as a basis for belief & practise is completely undermined when
The Bible is no longer considered absolute truth. If it isn't believed & obeyed, it has no authority & if it has no
authority it isn't relevant.
We
have seen a systematic waving goodbye to God’s Word as parts of The Church have
said ‘So Long, Scriptura’ to biblical
truth.
During
the 1970s & into the 1990s, The Charismatic Movement was in its ascendancy.
Traditional Pentecostalism followed in its slipstream & there were
adherents within other branches of established fundamentalism & nominal
denominations also. Their theology differed, but those who believed still believed that The Scriptures were
a vital & integral part of Christian life, doctrine & practise. It was
here, within Bible believing fundamentalism,
that post-modernism began to take root & grow. It incubated seeker
sensitivity & eventually it gave birth to emergence, but seeker sensitivity
was more of a method than a movement in & of itself. Nevertheless,
in an effort to reach out to a generation that was perceived as lost in
translation, a new way of ‘doing church’ was sought out & formulated.
Pentecostalism
had its own particular dogma, as did Charismania. However, the leading lights
within both movements began to lose a
generation of youth who either became bored with the same-old-same-old, grew
beyond their respective movements theologically, or who simply left altogether.
I was in the midst of one such generation. There were questions that The Church
either would not or could not answer & as a result of
this many began to adopt a more
liberal view of their faith & of The Bible.
I
strongly contend that if Scripture is being taught effectively & is
endorsed & validated far above
& beyond spiritual experience as
a barometer, folk will only leave our churches because they’re answering the
call of God to do something, somewhere else. In this, we have failed for the
most part & in that, I’m afraid rather miserably. Remember, we’re to be
built upon The Word of God & by The Word of God.
Wherefore laying aside all malice, and
all guile, and hypocrisies,
and envies, and all evil speakings, as
newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:
if so be ye have tasted that the Lord is
gracious (1stPeter2:1-3).
And I, brethren, could not speak unto
you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. I have fed you with milk, and not
with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to
bear it, neither yet now are ye able. For ye are yet carnal: for whereas
there is among you envying, and
strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men? For while one saith,
I am of Paul; and another, I am of
Apollos; are ye not carnal? (1stCorinthians3:1-3)
Notice
that both of these Apostles indicate
the provision of milk for the immature. Milk is nevertheless an initial part of
our diet while we grow & by which
we grow. This growth however, will never transpire while we remain in a state
of carnality & mere manhood. One of the reasons for this, apart from the ‘malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and
envies, and all evil speakings [&] envying, and strife, and divisions’
mentioned by Peter & Paul, is the very real fact that much Bible teaching within The Church has been milk
masquerading as meat. Beyond that, there are those who have formulated their own particular brand of theology [if it can be called that] & are
feeding their congregations nothing more or less than mutton dressed up as
lamb.
Of whom we have many things to say, and
hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing. For when for the time ye
ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the
oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong
meat. For every one that useth milk is
unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe. But strong
meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to
discern both good and evil (Hebrews5:11-14).
When
we depart from Scripture, we drift into unlit territory. We’re in the dark (Psalms119:105).
Again, we are to begin with the foundation of God’s Word, continue with it,
grow & mature by its agency & come to know its sufficiency. Are you
still holding your Bible in your hand? The Apostle Peter, a fisherman when
Christ had called him, recalls those moments on the mount of transfiguration.
He remembers the voice of God speaking out of the heavens. He was right there.
However, it wasn’t the value of the experience
that he promotes. He points us directly to Scripture.
For we have not followed cunningly
devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord
Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For he received from God
the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the
excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. And this
voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount.
We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take
heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the
day-star arise in your hearts: knowing this first, that no prophecy of the
Scripture is of any private interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old
time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost (2ndPeter1:16-21).
But
Peter doesn’t only point us to the inspired Scripture of the Old Testament, he
incorporates Apostolic Doctrine too as having the same Divine weight, as did the Apostle Paul also.
This second epistle, beloved, I now
write unto you; in both which I
stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance: that ye may be mindful of the
words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of
us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:
(2ndPeter3:1-2).
If any man think himself to be a
prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto
you are the commandments of the Lord. But if any man be ignorant, let him be
ignorant (1stCorinthians14:37-38).
Peter
continues, speaking of the Apostle Paul’s epistles, saying, ‘as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are
some things hard to be understood, which they that are
unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto
their own destruction. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye
also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own
steadfastness. But grow in grace, and in
the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and for ever. Amen’ (2nd Peter3:16-18).
The
unlearned (ignorant) & unstable (carnal) are more likely to relinquish
their hold on Scripture than those who are maturing on strong meat. There are
popular moves afoot today, intent on replacing God’s Word completely. There are
widespread trends that encourage a more liberal theology. There are messages
with more akin to Secular Humanism than the Gospel. The importance of Scripture
is being systematically eroded & those who once championed The Bible are
now slowly waving goodbye to it in order to embrace compromise. So Long,
Scriptura.
Are
you still holding your Bible in your hand my friend? Take to it once again
& as never before.
Whom shall he teach knowledge? and whom
shall he make to understand doctrine? them
that are weaned from the milk, and
drawn from the breasts. For precept must be upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line
upon line; here a little, and there
a little (Isaiah28:9-10).
copyright © by
David Samuel Parkins mmxvi all rights reserved.
no part of this
publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system in any form or by
any means, without the prior permission in writing of the author, nor be
otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which
it is presented & without a similar condition including this condition
being imposed on the subsequent purchaser
No comments:
Post a Comment