Thursday, 15 November 2018

Related image


The Axe OF

The Apostles

 

-2-

 

dominionism by divinisation 

 

Those of us within Pentecostalism, dipping our toes into charismatic waters, were told by our dear pastors that, ‘..whenever things become more important & more worthy of pursuit than The Lord Himself, we are in trouble.’ Well, our generation was in trouble & our leaders knew it. During that early period, we very stupidly set out to find our anointing & walk in it. Develop our God kind of faith & exercise it. Access the key to God’s power & wield it. Although we didn’t know it at the time, dominionism was the bit that we had clenched firmly between our teeth. We had been convinced that it was God’s will & God’s way forward for all believers to be moving in supernatural, miracle working power, constantly. That had become our goal. Some had swapped reading God’s Word for reading books by authors who had laid claim to the principles, keys & steps necessary to release the …..blah blah blah. You know what I’m saying to you. Despite all of our reading, no matter how many tape series we bought & listened to & regardless of the countless services we attended, there was no talk of submission to Christ or biblical discipleship. Dominion was the thing. Isaiah says, ‘Shall the axe boast itself against him that heweth therewith? Or shall the saw magnify itself against him that shaketh it? As if the rod should shake itself against them that lift it up, or as if the staff should lift up itself, as if it were no wood. Therefore shall the Lord, the Lord of hosts, send among his fat ones leanness; and under his glory he shall kindle a burning like the burning of a fire.’ (Isaiah 10:15-16). I don’t know about you, but it seems to me that there is something oh so appealing about dominion theology. I use the term theology loosely here because when viewed in the light of Scripture, the tenets of dominionism are thoroughly man centred. This is nothing new & if you’ll bear with me, you’ll soon see this for yourselves.  

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth (Genesis 1:26-28). 

Here we have the first recorded instance in which The Lord speaks of mankind having any dominion. This concerned the natural world. However, for most dominionists, who believe in a restorative rhetoric, these verses from Genesis is where they’ll always begin. By the way, I don’t know any believers within dominionism’s systems, who are strict vegetarians. Just sayin’. 

This dominion of the natural world was not to be the wielding of Divine power, control & influence, but rather, it was to facilitate man’s role as representative custodian. If dominionism’s first premise is wrong at best & blatantly false at worst, what does that say about its progression? If your doctrine is off, then you are off & if you have no formal & fundamental doctrine, you’re in freefall. This is where dominionism & its many manifestations dwell. Enter the charismatic wild geese of circa 1948-1952. 

Among Pentecostals at that time, there were still lines not to be crossed. Not so with up & coming charismatics. We’d heard of The New Order of The Latter Rain & William Marrion Branham. Many of the anecdotes that men like Kenneth Hagin had shared highlighted this man’s apparent prophetic ministry, but his newsletters were comprised of his sermons set out in verses as if they were Scripture. Ding-a-ling-a-ling, alarm bells ring. Pentecostals were having none of that. No matter how anointed a man was, he was just a man. Furthermore, because of Branham’s subsequent heretical doctrines & revelations, he was held at arm’s length. Rightly so. To this day there are those who still regard him as God in the flesh. 

This New Order of the Latter Rain is not to be confused with The Latter Rain movement of North Carolina & Tennessee during the 1880s, under the ministry of R. G. Spurling. This movement is well worth some study, but sadly, Spurling’s significance to Pentecostal history has long since been forgotten or ignored. Latterly, no pun intended, the work of George Warnock, who was a close friend of Branham’s, on The Feast of Tabernacles, went some way in cementing the movement’s leanings towards biblical typology as a means of interpreting their role in the coming revival & Kingdom restoration to & through them. Theologically however, this will very well be the undoing of the movement, simply because Jesus has not fulfilled several Messianic prophecies concerning Himself & won’t do so until His 2nd coming, including typology within The Feast of Tabernacles which speaks to The Millennium. Consequently, the core Doctrine of The Rapture has been both decried & denied by many modern Latter Rainers. 

Aspects of The Holiness Movement, which preceded The Latter Rain, had made inroads into Pentecostalism though, because Pentecostals love holiness. Dominion for Pentecostals, went as far as demons, disease & of course the flesh, but not world domination. This idea came later. For Latter Rainers, their view of Pentecostals & Holiness adherents was that they were representative of the former rain, which had to all intents & purposes dried up. The Latter Rain was where it was at now. Similarly, during this period of time, Charismatics were soaking up Latter Rain’s experiential offerings & had cultivated a clutch of leaders who would absorb its teachings & practises seamlessly into the Charismatic wave. Branham’s shadow straddled both spheres of influence. It continues to this day. 

He had been the darling of The Voice of Healing movement during the 1950s & because of the similarities between Latter Rain & Charismatic expression, belief & practise, it wasn’t difficult to introduce & assimilate Branham into the mainstream of Charismania. In the eyes of both movements, God was restoring, renewing & advancing His agenda in a tangible way. This is one of the ultimate goals of Dominionism. This is divinisation; exalting something that is clearly man-made, to Divine status. 

The Latter Rain didn’t stand still & even today it remains in a state of flux. This movement wasn’t directly defined by its titles, by its leaders or indeed by its woeful failures. This movement was defined by its mandate. Whether it’s known as Joel’s Army, Post Millennialism, Manifest Sons of God, Reconstructionism, Restorationism, Kingdom Now, or more recently the New Apostolic Reformation, the mandate remains the same. Not only Dominion by Divine Design, but also by Divinisation. 

There are any number of beliefs & practices that can be pointed to in order to identify this particular movement as a fast moving train wreck. However, by far the greatest indicator of the movement’s destination is its supreme lack of adherence to fundamental Doctrine. It completely disappears. Within this belief system, experience is prized more highly than anything else & certainly more highly than the Canon of Scripture that we have. Divinisation occurs when man decides that whatever he has to say takes precedence over whatever God has already said & sadly this is the case in point. This is more often than not disguised as the prophetic. 

It takes a certain amount of daring, stupidity & or audacity to make some of the bold claims that the leadership of this movement have, with nothing to show for their brazenness. They write their own narrative. They make their own rules. They twist whatever they can & discard whatever they can’t. They are by far the most dangerous threat to The Gospel right now because they are operating within The Church. 

But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we. For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works (2nd Corinthians 11:12-15). Their boasting is not good. 

This hasn’t happened overnight & what’s more, we have allowed it to happen. These men have cosied up to us as new Apostles & Prophets, often with more assumed apostolic umph than those who have gone before. They are Super Apostles, careering through The Body of Christ like pied pipers, sweeping young & old along with their sweet tunes, glossy presentations & thus saith The Lords. Some of us ought to know better & some of us do. 

You can be sure that all of the bells & whistles apportioned to this new movement are nothing more than cheap window dressing that covers a supreme lack of substance throughout. Look at its pedigree! This movement is nothing more or less than a Frankenstein’s monster comprised of different cherry picked parts, all thrown together & animated by a false spirit. The whole thing even has bolts in its neck! 

As we will see, the speed with which this movement has gathered momentum is indicative of the apathy within The Church. I’m not suggesting that we put on a show. I’m suggesting that we feed the hungry souls in our fellowships with the truth we have come to know from the Apostolic Doctrine we’ve received. I was once there. I was once seduced by the bright lights & candy floss. However, the glass is always half full & followers are always empty. 

For Latter Rainers, God is always about to do something & after they’ve been systematically hypnotised, mesmerised, anaesthetised, desensitised & mollified, they will be discarded as surplus to requirements. Their donations will always come in handy though. The  movement exists to perpetuate itself until it successfully evolves into its next manifestation. 

I say again, The Latter Rain didn’t stand still & even today it remains in a state of flux. This movement isn’t directly defined by its titles, by its leaders or indeed by its woeful failures. This movement is defined by its mandate. It is the extent to which the movement’s theology is emphasised in any particular church or fellowship, vision or doctrine, statement of faith or core values that will tell you how far this wasting theodemic disease has spread. 

We will take a good look at the who’s who within the current New Order of these folk, as well as the doctrine they espouse & their progress towards world domination for Christ. This is going to be interesting. In our next meeting we will examine dominionism as decree or declaration, as well as identify some of those who have transformed themselves into apostles of Christ. This movement has already begun to creak and wane under its own weight & eventually it will collapse. Brethren, do not remain within it or be a part of it when the whole thing comes crashing down.

 

 

 

 






copyright Ó by david Samuel Parkins mmxviii all rights reserved.
no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the author, nor be otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is presented & without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser



Thursday, 8 November 2018




The Axe OF

The Apostles 

-1- 

dominionism by divine design 

 

Back in the 1980s, when I thought that I was finding my feet theologically, there was a lot of talk about authority, dominion, power & might. However, this wasn’t being attributed to The Lord. It was being ascribed to The Church. Our situation has not improved. Somehow, I think that we’ve gotten the order more than a little wrong. Of course, the cry goes up ‘God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth’ (Genesis 1:26). Well, it does say that. I mean, those words are printed on the page, aren’t they? Yes, they are. However, I’m yet to see anyone who believes this particular brand of teaching concerning dominion, pop down to their local zoo & jump into an animal enclosure or an aquarium, exercising their dominion over fish, fowl, wild animal or creeping thing successfully. On the contrary, God’s plan for man was expressed before the fall & only at the culmination of this age will we see the legitimate restoration of these things. The Wolf will indeed lay down with the Lamb (Isaiah 11:6 & 65:25). Dominionism springs from & is reinforced by many of the common elements to be found within historic word of faith mythology; most especially the gnostic elements of teachings such as the authority of the believer & The Name of Jesus. This lore in turn finds its root in an unbiblical mysticism, which fuels the current New Apostolic Reformation. I’m reminded of Jeremiah’s words; ‘ Thou art my battle-axe and weapons of war: for with thee will I break in pieces the nations, and with thee will I destroy kingdoms; and with thee will I break in pieces the horse and his rider; and with thee will I break in pieces the chariot and his rider; with thee also will I break in pieces man and woman; and with thee will I break in pieces old and young; and with thee will I break in pieces the young man and the maid; I will also break in pieces with thee the shepherd and his flock; and with thee will I break in pieces the husbandman and his yoke of oxen; and with thee will I break in pieces captains and rulers.’ (Jeremiah 51:20-23). It’s all good, until the Prophet begins speaking about breaking shepherds! In reality however, it is The Lord Jesus Christ who holds all authority, dominion, power & might & not we ourselves. The moment that we think it is in our power that we do things, we are in real trouble. I am in no way attempting to suggest that God cannot use us. He has. He can. He will. He does. However, we are meant to submit to His authority, dominion, power & might. Instead, based on a series of twisted & badly stated theological diatribes, we attempt to exercise & wield these attributes as if they belong to us. They do not. They belong to Him & for the record, if you want that kind of authority, dominion, power & might, I suggest that you should be born of a virgin, live a sinless life & go to the cross. When you’ve accomplished that, complete a resurrection from the dead & ascend to The Father. Jesus said, ‘..All power is given unto ME in heaven and in earth (Matthew 28:18). The writer of Hebrews describes Christ as being ‘..appointed heir of all things…the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power (Hebrews 1:2-3). It ain’t about you. It ain’t about me. 

Dominionism wouldn’t be so very bad if it were about The Lord Jesus Christ, but it isn’t. Classic dominionism is about you & what you can do. Funnily enough though, despite all of the positive confessions, declarations of faith & misappropriation of Jesus’ mighty Name, nothing & I repeat, nothing has really changed within the ranks of the word of faith dominionist new apostolic reformation camps. There are still things, it would seem, that ought to make all of us go, hmmmmmmmmm. 

Notwithstanding, this movement's leaders & their followers still visit their ologists, opticians, dentists, general practitioners, surgeons & finally, their funeral directors. Dominionism as stated doesn’t work, yet multiplied millions continue to hold onto their glasses, which are always half full. They're told to hold on, press in, keep going, continue giving, confess & believe. In the economy of dominionism, God is always about to do something & if you quit now, when you’re so close, you’ll miss it. 

At the end of the day brethren, who do we really think we are? A simple reading of Scripture tells us exactly what we are in our humanity. We are a bunch of sinful & wretched rebels, completely unworthy of the amazing grace shown to us. Shouldn't that humble us? Shouldn't that make us overwhelmed with gratitude? Shouldn't that bring us to repentance? 

For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith (Romans 12:3). 

Personally, I view the position of dominionism within The Church as a boast against God, because it reminds me of the actions of a certain former angel & the disastrous mess his blind ambition created. Please, prove me wrong in this regard. Please. Brethren if you want dominion over something, consider conquering your sinful flesh. If you want power, opt to exercise godly self-control. If you want to be mighty, then humble yourself under the hand of God. 

Even with the best of intentions, we'd have to ignore huge swathes of Scripture to reach the unbiblical conclusions that significant numbers of dominionists have. Yet, ignore them they have. Ignore them they do. Ignore them they will. Why? Because all of the tenets of Dominionism are highly attractive. I'll summarise. 

1. In the new birth, The Holy Spirit re-creates the human spirit.

2. ...blah blah blah...

3. ...blah blah blah blah blah...

4. The Holy Spirit fills our re-created human spirit.

5. ...blah blah blah blah blah...

6. ...blah blah blah...

7. We possess God's Divine Nature. We are gods, with a small 'g'  ...blah blah blah...

8. Christ's authority, power & might are ours through The Spirit's indwelling  ...blah blah blah

9. We can do what Jesus did when He walked the earth  ...blah blah blah blah blah... 

At a glance my summary's rather tongue in cheek. I know. But as is the case with dominionism & its numerous derivatives, you have a series of ridiculous statements secured against another series of even more ridiculous statements. The blah blah blahs are nothing more than a representation of every sermon, book, YouTube clip & conference built on these shaky & foolishly presumptuous foundations. 

Perhaps we'd all be better off if we went back to The Bible instead of reading the plethora of books that have been written about it by men who claim a superiority to honest & thorough scholarship, by regaling us with their experience led testimonies. In my day, I'd read all of Kenneth Hagin's books. I'd read all of E.W. Kenyon's books. I'd read some of Kenneth Copeland's, but by far, my favourite writings were those of John Graham Lake. Although there are similarities between Lake, Kenyon & Hagin et al doctrinally, it was Lake's subjective presentation of miraculous power & the dominion thingy, that was the hook for me. I know. I can hear you rolling your eyes. 

I read Spiritual Hunger, The God Men & other sermons. His messages on Dominion over Demons, Disease & Death. Adventures in God. John G. Lake a Man Without Compromise. The New John G. Lake Sermons. At one time I was in correspondence with Lake's son-in-law's ministry & received a copy of Jesus, God's Way of Healing & Power to Promote Health. As well as this, their ministry sent me a copy of Lake's unpublished writings. I ate it all up. 

To dominionists, Lake remains highly quotable. He said: ‘The thing that was forfeited in the garden was regained. God gave him dominion over the works of His hand. God made him His understudy, His king to rule over everything that had life. Man was master, man lived in the realm of god. He lived on terms of equality with God. God was a faith God. All God had to do was to believe that the sun was, and the sun was. All God had to do was to believe that the planets would be, and they were. Man belonged to God's class of being - a faith man, And he lived in the creative realm of God.’ John G. Lake © Kenneth Copeland Publications, Fort Worth, Texas 1994 (emphasis added). 

The power of God, the Holy Ghost, is the Spirit of Dominion. It makes one a god.’ John G. Lake, John G. Lake, His Life, His Sermons, His Boldness of Faith © Kenneth Copeland Publications, Fort Worth, Texas 1994 (emphasis added). 

This & other statements by Lake captured my imagination at the time. I so wanted that power & might to be apparent in my life. This is the danger of dominionism when it's not about Christ. I never once asked the question as to whether this & other statements were true. I believed them as if they were because I wanted them to be.  If I had taken my Bible & checked, I would have seen that this wasn't true at all. 

The emphasis on dominion is a wrong emphasis. Lake's statements are typical of an all too common misconception among those who claim to be a part of Apostolic ministry & most especially the  new apostolic reformation. Just what was it that was forfeited by Adam in Eden? What did man lose there that he magically regains when his human spirit is recreated & when the new birth occurs? Does man then become a god once again? Once he's a god again, does he then have the power to wield the dominion that his new, Divine status affords him? Does this newly created god man walk around with no clothes on in his garden? 

This dominion, so highly sought after by so many, is not the dominion that God spoke of in the beginning. When did Adam exercise his God given dominion? When did the first man create anything? When do we see him using faith filled creative words? When was Adam a god, a king or a master? Perhaps my reading of the Genesis narrative is wrong when I conclude that Adam was to be an obedient servant. He was placed in the garden to dress it & keep it. My dominionist friends are yet to answer a simple question; Adam had absolute dominion but failed a test of obedience & allegiance? How does that even work? 

Where was Adam's creative mastery when the Serpent, a beast over which we are told that he had dominion, questioned his wife concerning God's Word & tempted her into eating forbidden fruit? Where was Adam's godhood & Divine quality when his wife handed him the same fruit & he ate it too? Dominionism fails to address this biblically. Dominionism fails, full stop. 

Do we really think for one minute that Almighty God is in the business of giving us His power & might, simply because we've been taught that it's our Divine right? Some. However, The One to Whom all power in heaven & on Earth has been given, gave His Apostles His Doctrine & they gave this Doctrine to The Church. He didn't say all power has been given to us. Even when The Holy Spirit is promised by The Lord Jesus, He says nothing about us taking over the world & everything about preaching His Gospel (Acts 1:1-8). So where in the world does this unsafe doctrine of dominionism come from & more importantly, just where is it going?

 

 

 

 

 

 



copyright Ó by david Samuel Parkins mmxviii all rights reserved.
no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the author, nor be otherwise circulated in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is presented & without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser