Thursday, 15 November 2018

The Axe of The 'APOSTLES' Part2: Dominion as Divinisation

Related image


The Axe of The ‘Apostles’ Part2:
Dominionism as Divinisation

Now faith is the substrate of things hyped for, the edifice of things obscene


Shall the axe boast itself against him that heweth therewith? Or shall the saw magnify itself against him that shaketh it? As if the rod should shake itself against them that lift it up, or as if the staff should lift up itself, as if it were no wood. Therefore shall the Lord, the Lord of hosts, send among his fat ones leanness; and under his glory he shall kindle a burning like the burning of a fire (Isaiah10:15-16).

When I was a teenager within Pentecostalism, one of my dear, old pastors told me [that] ‘..whenever the things of God become more important & worthy of pursuit than The Lord Himself, we are in trouble.’ Well, I was in trouble then & he knew it. During that early period of my Christian life, I very stupidly set out to find my anointing & walk in it. Develop my God-kind-of-faith & exercise it. Access the key to God’s power & wield it. Although I didn’t know it at the time, Dominionism was the bit that I had clenched firmly between my teeth.

I had been convinced that it was God’s will & God’s way forward for all believers to be moving in supernatural, miracle working power, constantly. That had become my goal. I had swapped reading God’s Word for reading books by authors who had laid claim to the principles, keys & steps necessary to release the    …..blah blah blah. You know what I’m saying to you. Despite all of my reading, no matter how many tape series I bought & listened to & regardless of the countless services I attended, there was no talk of submission to Christ or biblical discipleship. Dominion was THE thing.

I don’t know about you, but it seems to me that there is something oh so appealing about Dominion theology. I use the term theology loosely here because when viewed in the light of Scripture, the tenets of Dominionism are thoroughly man centred. This is nothing new & if you’ll bear with me, you’ll soon see this.

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the
fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so. And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day (Genesis1:26-31).

Here we have the first recorded instance in which The Lord speaks of mankind having any dominion. This concerned the natural world. However, for most Dominionists, who believe in a restorative rhetoric, these verses from Genesis is where they’ll begin. By the way, I don’t know any believers in Dominionism’s systems that are vegetarian. Just sayin’.

This dominion of the natural world was not to be the wielding of Divine power, control & influence, but rather, it was to facilitate man’s role as representative custodian. If Dominionism’s first premise is wrong [at best] & blatantly false [at worst], what does that say about its progression? This is a rhetorical question.

*If your doctrine is off, then YOU are off & if you have NO formal & fundamental doctrine, you’re in freefall. This is where Dominionism & its many manifestations dwell. Enter the wild Charismatic Geese of circa 1948-1952. The chase was afoot.

At least during my heady days as a Pentecostal there were lines NOT to be crossed. I’d heard of The New Order of The Latter Rain & William Branham as of the many anecdotes Kenneth Hagin had shared about this man’s apparent prophetic ministry, but had never really gotten into Branham’s teachings because his newsletter comprised of his sermons set out in verses as if they were Scripture. Ding-a-ling-a-ling, alarm bells ring. Pentecostals were having none of that. No matter how anointed a man was, he was just a man. Furthermore, because of Branham’s subsequent unbiblical doctrines & revelations, he was held at arm’s length.

*This New Order of the Latter Rain is not to be confused with The Latter Rain movement of North Carolina & Tennessee during the 1880s, under the ministry of R. G. Spurling. This movement is well worth some study, but sadly, Spurling’s significance to Pentecostalism’s history has long since been forgotten or ignored. Latterly (no pun intended), the work of George Warnock -a close friend of Branham’s- on The Feast of Tabernacles, went some way in cementing the movement’s leanings towards biblical typology as a means of interpreting their role in the coming revival & Kingdom restoration to & through them. Theologically however, this will very well be the undoing of the movement, simply because Jesus has not fulfilled several Messianic prophecies concerning Himself & won’t do so until His 2nd coming, including typology within The Feast of Tabernacles which speaks to The Millennium. Consequently, the core Doctrine of The Rapture has been both decried & denied by modern Latter Rainers. More of this in Part 3.

Aspects of The Holiness movement [which preceded The Latter Rain] had made inroads into Pentecostalism though, because Pentecostals LURVE holiness. Dominion, for Pentecostals, went as far as demons, disease & of course the flesh, but not world domination. This idea came later.

For Latter Rainers, their view of Pentecostals & Holiness adherents was that they were representative of the former rain, which had [to all intents & purposes] dried up. The Latter Rain was where it was at now. Similarly, during this period of time, Charismatics were soaking up Latter Rain’s experiential offerings & had cultivated a clutch of leaders who would absorb its teachings & practises seamlessly into the Charismatic wave. Branham’s shadow straddled both spheres of influence.

He had been the darling of The Voice of Healing movement during the 1950s & because of the similarities between Latter Rain & Charismatic expression, belief & practise, it wasn’t difficult to introduce & assimilate Branham into the mainstream of Charismania. In the eyes of BOTH movements, God was restoring, renewing & advancing His agenda in a tangible way. This is one of the ultimate goals of Dominionism. This is DIVINISATION.

The Latter Rain didn’t stand still & even today it remains in a state of flux. This movement wasn’t directly defined by its titles, by its leaders or indeed by its woeful failures. This movement was defined by its mandate. Whether it’s known as Joel’s Army, Post Millennialism, The Manifest Sons of God, Restorationism, Kingdom Now, Reconstructionism or New Apostolic Reformation, the mandate remains the same. Not only Dominion as Divine Design, but also as Divinisation.

As I write this, I also consider many, MANY of the folk who are on my back. The most common question I’m asked is ‘David, why do you have to attack & attack people who are doing nothing more than preaching The Gospel, healing, delivering, training and building et cetera?’ My answer is [that] I’m not doing that because it isn’t the case with the NAR. This movement is dangerous & poisonous. Selah’. I suggest a regular reading & study of Scripture, because I can guarantee that a low [or no] estimation of Scripture will lead individuals into the airy-fairy realm of experience.

There are any number of beliefs & practices that can be pointed to in order to identify this movement as a train wreck. However, by far the greatest indicator of the movement’s destination is its supreme lack of adherence to fundamental Doctrine. Within this movement, experience is prized more highly than anything else & certainly more highly than the blessed canon of Scripture that we have. Divinisation occurs when man decides that whatever HE has to say takes precedence over whatever God has ALREADY said & sadly this is the case in point.

It takes a certain amount of daring or stupidity to make some of the bold claims that the leadership of this movement have, with nothing to show for their audacity. They write their own narrative. They make their own rules. They twist whatever they can & discard whatever they can’t. They are by far THE most dangerous threat to The Gospel right now because they are operating within The Church.

But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion; that wherein they glory, they may be found even as we. For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works (2ndCorinthians11:12-15). Their boasting is not good.

This hasn’t happened overnight & what’s more, we have allowed it to happen. These men & women have cosied up to us as NEW Apostles & Prophets, often with more [assumed] apostolic umph than those who have gone before. They are Super-Apostles, careering through The Body of Christ like pied pipers, sweeping young & old along with their sweet tunes, glossy presentations & ‘thus saith The Lords’. Some of us ought to know better & some of us DO.

You can be sure that all of the bells & whistles apportioned to this ‘new’ movement are nothing more than window dressing that covers a supreme lack of substance throughout. Look at its pedigree!! This movement is nothing more or less than a Frankenstein’s Monster comprised of different cherry-picked parts, all thrown together & animated by a false spirit. The whole thing even has bolts in its head!!

As we will see, the speed with which this movement has gathered momentum is indicative of the apathy within The Church. I’m not suggesting that we put on a show. I’m suggesting that we feed the hungry souls in our fellowships with the truth we have come to know from the Apostolic Doctrine we’ve received. I was once there. I was once seduced by the bright lights & candy floss. However, the glass is always half full.

For Latter Rainers, God is always ‘about to do’ something brethren & after they’ve been hypnotised, mesmerised, anaesthetised, desensitised & pacified, they will be discarded. I say again, The Latter Rain didn’t stand still & even today it remains in a state of flux. This movement isn’t directly defined by its titles, by its leaders or indeed by its woeful failures. This movement is defined by its MANDATE. It is the extent to which the movement’s theology is emphasised in any particular church or fellowship, vision or doctrine, statement of faith or core values that will tell you how far this wasting theodemic disease has spread.

Let’s take a good look at the who’s who within the current New Order of these folk, as well as the doctrine they espouse & their progress towards world domination for Christ. This is going to be interesting.

And we beseech you, brethren, to know them which labor among
you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; and to esteem them very highly in love for their work’s sake. And be at peace among yourselves (1stThessalonians5:12-13).

Remember them which have the rule over you, who have spoken
unto you the word of God: whose faith follow, considering the end of their conversation…...Obey them that have the rule over you, and submit yourselves: for they watch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not with grief: for that is unprofitable for you. (Hebrews13:7&17).


https://youtu.be/7WboWrp-Cwo Look out for the yawning lady around 12 & a half minutes in.


Thursday, 8 November 2018

The Axe of The Apostles Part1: Dominionism as Divine Design




The Axe of The ‘Apostles’
 Part1:
Dominionism as Divine Design
Now, faith is the substrate of things hyped for, the edifice of things obscene



Thou art my battle-axe and weapons of war: for with thee will I break in pieces the nations, and with thee will I destroy kingdoms; and with thee will I break in pieces the horse and his rider; and with thee will I break in pieces the chariot and his rider; with thee also will I break in pieces man and woman; and with thee will I break in pieces old and young; and with thee will I break in pieces the young man and the maid; I will also break in pieces with thee the shepherd and his flock; and with thee will I break in pieces the husbandman and his yoke of oxen; and with thee will I break in pieces captains and rulers (Jeremiah51:20-23).

Back in the 1980s, when I thought that I was finding my feet theologically, there was a lot of talk about authority, dominion, power & might. However, this wasn’t being attributed to The Lord. It was being ascribed to The Church. Our situation has not improved. Somehow, I think that we have gotten the order more than a little wrong.

Of course, the cry goes up ‘God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth’ (Genesis1:26). Well, it does say that. I mean, those words are printed on the page, aren’t they? Yes, they are. However, I’m yet to see anyone who believes this particular brand of things concerning dominion, pop down to their local zoo & jump into an animal enclosure or an aquarium, exercising their dominion over fish, fowl, wild animal or creeping thing successfully. On the contrary, God’s plan for man was expressed before the fall & only at the culmination of this age will we see the legitimate restoration of these things. The Wolf will indeed lay down with the Lamb.

Dominionism springs from [& is reinforced by] many of the common elements to be found within historic word-of-faith mythology, most especially the gnostic elements of teachings such as the authority of the believer & the Name of Jesus. This mythology in turn finds its root in an unbiblical mysticism, which fuels the current [so-called] New Apostolic Reformation. In reality however, it is The Lord Jesus Christ who holds ALL authority, dominion, power & might & not we ourselves. The moment that we think it is in our own power that we do things, we are in real trouble. I am in no way attempting to suggest that God cannot use us. He has. He can. He will. He does.

However, we are meant to submit to HIS authority, dominion, power & might. Instead, based on a series of twisted & badly stated theological diatribes, we attempt to exercise & wield these attributes as if they belong to us. They do not. They belong to Him & for the record, if you want that kind of authority, dominion, power & might, I suggest that you should be born of a virgin, live a sinless life & go to the cross. When you’ve accomplished that, complete a resurrection from the dead & ascend to The Father. Jesus said, ‘..All power is given unto ME in heaven and in earth (Matthew28:18). The writer of Hebrews describes Christ as being ‘..appointed heir of all things…the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power (Hebrews1:2-3).

Dominionism wouldn’t be so very bad if it were about The Lord Jesus Christ, but it isn’t. Classic Dominionism is about YOU. Dominionism is about YOU & what YOU can do. Funnily enough though, despite all of the positive confessions, declarations of faith & misappropriation of Jesus’ mighty Name, nothing [I repeat, NOTHING] has really changed within the ranks of the Word-of-Faith-Dominionist-New-Apostolic-Reformation camps. There are still things, it would seem, that ought to make all of us go, hmmmmmmmmm.

Notwithstanding, this movement's leaders & their followers still visit their doctors, opticians, dentists, general practitioners, surgeons & finally, their funeral directors. Dominionism, as stated, doesn’t work, yet multiplied millions continue to hold onto their glasses, which are always half full. They're told to hold on, press in, keep going, continue giving, confess & believe. In the economy of Dominionism, God is always about to do something & if you quit now, when you’re SO close, you’ll miss it. Well, personally I’m more interested in what God has already said & done. This is revealed to us in the closed canon of Scripture.

At the end of the day brethren, who do we really think we are? I'm being very serious here. A simple reading of Scripture tells us EXACTLY what we are in our humanity. We are a bunch of sinful & wretched rebels, completely unworthy of the amazing grace shown to us. Shouldn't that humble us? Shouldn't that make us overwhelmed with gratitude? Shouldn't that bring us to repentance? These are rhetorical questions, but valid questions nevertheless.

For I say, through the grace given unto me, to every man that is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly, according as God hath dealt to every man the measure of faith (Romans12:3).

Personally, I view the position of Dominionism within The Church as a boast against God because it reminds me of the actions of a certain [former] angel & the disastrous mess his blind ambition created. Please, prove me wrong in this regard. Please. Brethren if you want dominion over something, consider conquering your sinful flesh. If you want power, opt to exercise godly self-control. If you want to be mighty, then humble yourselves under the hand of God.

Even with the best of intentions, we'd have to ignore HUGE swathes of Scripture to reach the unbiblical conclusions that significant numbers of dominionists have. Yet, ignore them we have. Ignore them we do. Ignore them we will. Why? Because all of the tenets of Dominionism are highly attractive. I'll summarise.

1. In the new birth The Holy Spirit re-creates the human spirit.
2. ...blah blah blah...
3. ...blah blah blah blah blah...
4. The Holy Spirit fills our re-created human spirit.
5. ...blah blah blah blah blah...
6. ...blah blah blah...
7. We possess God's Divine Nature. We are gods with a small 'g'  ...blah blah blah...
8. Christ's authority, power & might are ours through The Spirit's indwelling  ...blah blah blah
9. We can do what Jesus did when He walked the earth  ...blah blah blah blah blah...

At a glance my summary's rather tongue in cheek, I know, but as is the case with Dominionism & its numerous derivatives, you have a series of ridiculous statements secured against another series of even more ridiculous statements. The blah blah blahs are nothing more than a representation of every sermon series, book, YouTube clip & conference built on these shaky & foolishly presumptuous foundations.

Perhaps we'd all be better off if we went back to The Bible instead of reading the plethora of books that have been written about it by men & women who claim a superiority to honest & thorough scholarship by regaling us with their experience led testimonies. In my day, I'd read all of Kenneth Hagin's books. I'd read all of E.W. Kenyon's books. I'd read some of Kenneth Copeland's, but by far, my favourite writings were those of Dr. John Graham Lake. Although there are similarities between Lake, Kenyon & Hagin et al doctrinally, it was Lake's subjective presentation of God's miraculous power, the dominion thingy, that was the hook for me.

I read Spiritual Hunger, The God Men & other sermons. His messages on Dominion over Demons, Disease & Death. Adventures in God. John G. Lake a Man Without Compromise. The New John G. Lake Sermons. At one time I was in correspondence with Lake's son-in-law's ministry & received a copy of Jesus, God's Way of Healing & Power to Promote Health. As well as this, their ministry sent me a copy of Lake's unpublished writings. I ate it all up.

To Dominionists, Lake remains highly quotable. He said: "The thing that was forfeited in the garden was regained. God gave him [Adam] dominion over the works of His hand. God made him His understudy, His king to rule over everything that had life. Man was master, man lived in the realm of god. He lived on terms of equality with God. God was a faith God. All God had to do was to believe that the sun was, and the sun was. All God had to do was to believe that the planets would be, and they were. Man belonged to God's class of being - a faith man, And he lived in the creative realm of God." – John G. Lake, Kenneth Copeland Publications, Fort Worth, Texas 1994, pg. 66.

"The power of God, the Holy Ghost, is the Spirit of Dominion. It makes one a god." – John G. Lake, John G. Lake, His Life, His Sermons, His Boldness of Faith, 1995, pg. 13.

This & other statements by Lake captured my imagination at the time. I SO wanted that power & might to be apparent in my life. This is the danger of Dominionism when it's not about Christ. I never once asked the question as to whether this & other statements were true. I believed them as if they were because I wanted them to be.  If I had taken my Bible & checked, I would have seen that this wasn't true at all.

The emphasis on dominion is a wrong emphasis. Lake's statement is typical of an all too common misconception among those who claim to be a part of Apostolic ministry & most especially the [so called] New Apostolic Reformation. Just what was it that was forfeited by Adam in Eden? What did man lose there that he magically regains when 'his human spirit is recreated' & when the new birth occurs, does man then become a god once again? Once he's a god again, does he then have the power to wield the dominion that his new, Divine status affords him?

This dominion that is SO highly sought after by SO many, is not the dominion that God spoke of in the beginning. When did Adam exercise his God-given dominion? At what time did the first man create anything? On what occasion do we see him using faith-filled-creative-words? When? When was Adam a god, a king or a master? Perhaps my reading of the Genesis narrative is wrong when I conclude that Adam was to be an obedient servant. He was placed in the garden to dress it & keep it. Having dominion but failing a test of obedience & allegiance? How does that even work?

Where was Adam's creative mastery when the Serpent, a beast over which we are told that he had dominion, questioned his wife concerning God's Word & tempted her into eating forbidden fruit? Where was Adam's godhood & Divine quality when his wife handed him the same fruit & he ate it too? Dominionism fails to address this biblically. Dominionism fails, full stop.

The usual response I get to these & other poignant questions is, "Dave, it's not as simple as that.", to which I reply, "ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha."

Do we really think for one minute that Almighty God is in the business of giving us His power & might, simply because we've been taught that it's our right? Some of us do. However, The One to Whom ALL power in heaven & on Earth has been given, gave His Apostles His Doctrine & they gave this Doctrine to The Church. He didn't say all power has been given to US. Even when The Holy Spirit is promised by The Lord Jesus, He says nothing about us taking over the world (Acts1:1-8). So where in the world does this unsafe doctrine of Dominionism come from & brethren, more importantly, just where is it going?